2 586 263 views
Star Wars: Battlefront Weapon comparison: RT-97C vs Cycler Rifle
Symthic SW: Battlefront stats version
1.10

Weapon 1

VS
Weapon

Weapon 2

Apply attachment changes

RT-97C
vs
Cycler Rifle
Advantages of RT-97C
Damage-drop off ends a lot further
50 m
vs
20 m
RT-97C's Damage drop-off ends 150% further
Much higher fire rate
600 rpm
vs
60 rpm
RT-97C fires rounds 900% faster
Slightly higher maximum distance
1500 m
vs
1350 m
RT-97C's bullets fly 11% further
Higher muzzle velocity
500 m/s
vs
450 m/s
RT-97C's bullets fly 11% faster
Significatly less upwards recoil
0.25
vs
1.5
RT-97C has 83% less upwards kick
Significantly less spread (HIP, Stand, Not moving)
0.2
vs
1
RT-97C has 80% lower HIP base spread (Standing, Not moving)
Significantly less spread (HIP, Crouching, Not moving)
0.2
vs
1
RT-97C has 80% lower HIP base spread (Crouch, Not moving)
Significantly less spread (HIP, Stand, Moving)
0.2
vs
1.5
RT-97C has 87% lower HIP base spread (Standing, Moving)
Significantly less spread (HIP, Crouching, Moving)
0.2
vs
1.5
RT-97C has 87% lower HIP base spread (Crouch, Moving)

Learn more about the RT-97C:

Advantages of Cycler Rifle
Much more max damage
100
vs
17
Cycler Rifle does 488% more damage at close range
Much more min damage
90
vs
14
Cycler Rifle does 543% more damage at long range

Learn more about the Cycler Rifle

Equal stats on RT-97C and Cycler_Rifle
Same drop-off start distance
10 m
vs
10 m
Damage starts to drop at the same distance
Same Recoil decrease
15
vs
15
Both guns recover from recoil as fast as the other
Same first shot recoil multiplier
1 x
vs
1 x
Both guns have same first shot recoil multiplier
Same amount of spread (ADS, moving)
0.2
vs
0.2
Both guns have same amount of ADS spread (Moving)
6.2401294708252