11 824 350 views
Battlefield 1 Weapon comparison: Russian 1895 Infantry vs Huot Automatic Low Weight
Symthic BF1 stats version
1.08
Notice

Weapons that show "N/A" for all reload values have dynamic reload times. See reload mechanics page for more information.

!

Weapon 1

VS
Weapon
Attachment 1
Attachment 2

Weapon 2

Apply attachment changes

Russian 1895 Infantry
+ None + None
vs
Huot Automatic Low Weight
+ None + None
Advantages of Russian 1895 Infantry + None + None
Much more max damage
100
vs
23
Russian 1895 Infantry has 335% higher max damage
Much more min damage
80
vs
15
Russian 1895 Infantry has 433% higher min damage
Higher muzzle velocity
820 m/s
vs
740 m/s
Russian 1895 Infantry's bullets fly 11% faster
A bit lower first shot recoil multiplier
1 x
vs
1.4 x
Russian 1895 Infantry's First shot recoil multiplier is 29% lower
Significantly less spread (ADS, not moving)
0
vs
0.18
Russian 1895 Infantry has 100% lower ADS base spread (Not moving)
Much quicker to fire after switching weapons
0.9 s
vs
1.2 s
Russian 1895 Infantry has 25% faster firing after weapon switch
Advantages of Huot Automatic Low Weight + None + None
Much higher fire rate
475 rpm
vs
56 rpm
Huot Automatic Low Weight fires rounds 748% faster
Much larger magazine
26
vs
5
Huot Automatic Low Weight has 420% bigger magazine
Significatly less upwards recoil
0.28
vs
2
Huot Automatic Low Weight has 86% less upwards kick
Significatly less recoil to left
0.08
vs
1
Huot Automatic Low Weight has 92% less kick to left
Significatly less recoil to right
0.08
vs
1
Huot Automatic Low Weight has 92% less kick to right
A lot faster Recoil decrease
10.002
vs
4.5
Huot Automatic Low Weight recovers 122% faster from recoil
Significantly less spread (ADS, moving)
0.82
vs
1
Huot Automatic Low Weight has 18% lower ADS base spread (Moving)
Significantly less spread increase per shot (ADS)
-0.106
vs
0
Spread increases 100% less on Huot Automatic Low Weight when shooting (ADS)
Slightly less spread (HIP, Stand, Not moving)
2
vs
2.5
Huot Automatic Low Weight has 20% lower HIP base spread (Standing, Not moving)
Slightly less spread (HIP, Crouching, Not moving)
1.75
vs
2
Huot Automatic Low Weight has 13% lower HIP base spread (Crouch, Not moving)
Significantly less spread (HIP, Stand, Moving)
2.75
vs
4
Huot Automatic Low Weight has 31% lower HIP base spread (Standing, Moving)
Significantly less spread (HIP, Crouching, Moving)
2.5
vs
3.5
Huot Automatic Low Weight has 29% lower HIP base spread (Crouch, Moving)
Significantly less spread (HIP, Prone, Moving)
2.25
vs
3
Huot Automatic Low Weight has 25% lower HIP base spread (Prone, Moving)
Much lower first shot spread multiplier (HIP)
-4
vs
1
Huot Automatic Low Weight's First shot spread multiplier is 500% lower (HIP)
Much lower first shot spread multiplier (ADS)
-4
vs
1
Huot Automatic Low Weight's First shot spread multiplier is 500% lower (ADS)
Much faster spread decrease (HIP)
27
vs
10.05
Huot Automatic Low Weight recovers 169% faster from spread (HIP)
Significantly less spread increase per shot (HIP)
-0.225
vs
1
Spread increases 123% less on Huot Automatic Low Weight when shooting (HIP)
Equal stats on Russian 1895 Infantry + None + None and Huot_Automatic_Low_Weight + None + None
Equal bullet drop
12 m/s²
vs
12 m/s²
Both guns have same bullet drop
Same amount of spread (HIP, Prone, Not moving)
1.5
vs
1.5
Both guns have same amount of HIP spread (Prone, Not moving)
Same number of pellets
1
vs
1
Both guns fire equal amount of pellets
Same pellet cone spread
0
vs
0
Both guns have same pellet spread
9.0618133544922