Symthic was shut down on January 11th, 2019. You're viewing an archive of this page from 2019-01-12 at 20:16. Thank you all for your support! Please get in touch via the Curse help desk if you need any support using this archive. Join Symthic on Discord.

10 946 583 views
Battlefield Hardline Weapon comparison: 388-RECON vs FAMAS
Symthic BF:H stats version
1.7
Note: PC version of "Battlefield: Hardline" uses different weapon stats than consoles. Numbers shown on Symthic are for PC only.
!

Weapon 1

VS
Weapon
Attachment 1
Attachment 2

Weapon 2

Apply attachment changes

388-RECON
+ None + None
vs
FAMAS
+ None + None
Advantages of 388-RECON + None + None
Much more max damage
90
vs
24
388-RECON does 275% more damage at close range
Much more min damage
59
vs
12
388-RECON does 392% more damage at long range
Damage-drop off starts a little further
30 m
vs
25 m
388-RECON's Damage drop-off starts 20% further
Damage-drop off ends a lot further
100 m
vs
50 m
388-RECON's Damage drop-off ends 100% further
Way less bullet drop
9.81 m/s²
vs
15 m/s²
388-RECON has 35% less bullet drop
Much longer maximum distance
2400 m
vs
750 m
388-RECON's bullets fly 220% further
Slightly less upwards recoil (ADS, Stand)
0.5
vs
0.53
388-RECON has 6% less upwards kick (ADS, Stand)
A bit lower first shot recoil multiplier
2 x
vs
2.3 x
388-RECON's First shot recoil multiplier is 13% lower
Advantages of FAMAS + None + None
Much higher fire rate
850 rpm
vs
39 rpm
FAMAS fires rounds 2079% faster
Much larger magazine
26
vs
6
FAMAS has 333% bigger magazine
A bit faster tactical reload (Bullets left)
2.9 s
vs
3.2 s
FAMAS reloads 9% faster when there is a bullet in the chamber
A bit faster empty reload
4.1 s
vs
4.11 s
FAMAS reloads 0% faster when there's no bullet in the chamber
Higher muzzle velocity
500 m/s
vs
480 m/s
FAMAS's bullets fly 4% faster
A lot faster Recoil decrease (ADS, Stand)
15
vs
6
FAMAS recovers 150% faster from recoil (ADS, Stand)
Significantly less spread (ADS, moving)
0.76
vs
1.5
FAMAS has 49% lower ADS base spread (Moving)
Significantly less spread (HIP, Stand, Not moving)
2.25
vs
5
FAMAS has 55% lower HIP base spread (Standing, Not moving)
Significantly less spread (HIP, Crouching, Not moving)
1.875
vs
4
FAMAS has 53% lower HIP base spread (Crouch, Not moving)
Significantly less spread (HIP, Prone, Not moving)
1.5
vs
3
FAMAS has 50% lower HIP base spread (Prone, Not moving)
Significantly less spread (HIP, Stand, Moving)
3.375
vs
6
FAMAS has 44% lower HIP base spread (Standing, Moving)
Significantly less spread (HIP, Crouching, Moving)
2.875
vs
5
FAMAS has 43% lower HIP base spread (Crouch, Moving)
Significantly less spread (HIP, Prone, Moving)
2.375
vs
4
FAMAS has 41% lower HIP base spread (Prone, Moving)
Equal stats on 388-RECON + None + None and FAMAS + None + None
13.092994689941