Symthic was shut down on January 11th, 2019. You're viewing an archive of this page from 2019-01-12 at 20:16. Thank you all for your support! Please get in touch via the Curse help desk if you need any support using this archive. Join Symthic on Discord.

10 946 586 views
Battlefield Hardline Weapon comparison: 388-RECON vs FN FAL
Symthic BF:H stats version
1.7
Note: PC version of "Battlefield: Hardline" uses different weapon stats than consoles. Numbers shown on Symthic are for PC only.
!

Weapon 1

VS
Weapon
Attachment 1
Attachment 2

Weapon 2

Apply attachment changes

388-RECON
+ None + None
vs
FN FAL
+ None + None
Advantages of 388-RECON + None + None
Much more max damage
90
vs
33
388-RECON does 173% more damage at close range
Much more min damage
59
vs
22
388-RECON does 168% more damage at long range
Damage-drop off ends a lot further
100 m
vs
60 m
388-RECON's Damage drop-off ends 67% further
Way less bullet drop
9.81 m/s²
vs
15 m/s²
388-RECON has 35% less bullet drop
Much longer maximum distance
2400 m
vs
1050 m
388-RECON's bullets fly 129% further
Significatly less upwards recoil (ADS, Stand)
0.5
vs
1.3
388-RECON has 62% less upwards kick (ADS, Stand)
Advantages of FN FAL + None + None
Much higher fire rate
700 rpm
vs
39 rpm
FN FAL fires rounds 1695% faster
Much larger magazine
21
vs
6
FN FAL has 250% bigger magazine
Much faster tactical reload (Bullets left)
1.8 s
vs
3.2 s
FN FAL reloads 44% faster when there is a bullet in the chamber
Much faster empty reload
2.5 s
vs
4.11 s
FN FAL reloads 39% faster when there's no bullet in the chamber
Much higher muzzle velocity
700 m/s
vs
480 m/s
FN FAL's bullets fly 46% faster
A lot faster Recoil decrease (ADS, Stand)
20
vs
6
FN FAL recovers 233% faster from recoil (ADS, Stand)
A bit lower first shot recoil multiplier
1.2 x
vs
2 x
FN FAL's First shot recoil multiplier is 40% lower
Significantly less spread (ADS, moving)
1
vs
1.5
FN FAL has 33% lower ADS base spread (Moving)
Significantly less spread (HIP, Stand, Not moving)
2
vs
5
FN FAL has 60% lower HIP base spread (Standing, Not moving)
Significantly less spread (HIP, Crouching, Not moving)
2.5
vs
4
FN FAL has 38% lower HIP base spread (Crouch, Not moving)
Significantly less spread (HIP, Prone, Not moving)
2
vs
3
FN FAL has 33% lower HIP base spread (Prone, Not moving)
Significantly less spread (HIP, Stand, Moving)
3.5
vs
6
FN FAL has 42% lower HIP base spread (Standing, Moving)
Significantly less spread (HIP, Crouching, Moving)
3
vs
5
FN FAL has 40% lower HIP base spread (Crouch, Moving)
Significantly less spread (HIP, Prone, Moving)
2.5
vs
4
FN FAL has 38% lower HIP base spread (Prone, Moving)
Equal stats on 388-RECON + None + None and FN_FAL + None + None
Same drop-off start distance
30 m
vs
30 m
Damage starts to drop at the same distance
13.343095779419