Symthic was shut down on January 11th, 2019. You're viewing an archive of this page from 2019-01-12 at 19:10. Thank you all for your support! Please get in touch via the Curse help desk if you need any support using this archive. Join Symthic on Discord.

93 294 787 views
Battlefield 4 Weapon comparison: SR338 vs ACE 52 CQB
Symthic BF4 stats version
1.4
!

Weapon 1

VS
Weapon
Attachment 1
Attachment 2

Weapon 2

Apply attachment changes

SR338
+ None + None
vs
ACE 52 CQB
+ None + None
Advantages of SR338 + None + None
Much more max damage
50
vs
33
SR338 does 52% more damage at close range
Much more min damage
38
vs
18
SR338 does 111% more damage at long range
Damage-drop off starts a lot further
15 m
vs
8 m
SR338's Damage drop-off starts 88% further
Damage-drop off ends a lot further
150 m
vs
50 m
SR338's Damage drop-off ends 200% further
Way less bullet drop
9.81 m/s²
vs
15 m/s²
SR338 has 35% less bullet drop
Much longer maximum distance
3000 m
vs
600 m
SR338's bullets fly 400% further
Much faster empty reload
2.6 s
vs
3.4 s
SR338 reloads 24% faster when there's no bullet in the chamber
Much higher muzzle velocity
600 m/s
vs
400 m/s
SR338's bullets fly 50% faster
Significatly less recoil to left
0.05
vs
0.3
SR338 has 83% less kick to left
Significatly less recoil to right
0.1
vs
0.3
SR338 has 67% less kick to right
A bit lower first shot recoil multiplier
1 x
vs
1.95 x
SR338's First shot recoil multiplier is 49% lower
Slightly less spread increase per shot
0.1
vs
0.112
Spread increases 11% less on SR338 when shooting
Advantages of ACE 52 CQB + None + None
Much higher fire rate
650 rpm
vs
200 rpm
ACE 52 CQB fires rounds 225% faster
Much larger magazine
26
vs
11
ACE 52 CQB has 136% bigger magazine
Significatly less upwards recoil
0.56
vs
1.1
ACE 52 CQB has 49% less upwards kick
Significantly less spread (ADS, moving)
0.8
vs
1
ACE 52 CQB has 20% lower ADS base spread (Moving)
Significantly less spread (HIP, Stand, Not moving)
2
vs
3
ACE 52 CQB has 33% lower HIP base spread (Standing, Not moving)
Significantly less spread (HIP, Crouching, Not moving)
1.5
vs
2.5
ACE 52 CQB has 40% lower HIP base spread (Crouch, Not moving)
Significantly less spread (HIP, Prone, Not moving)
1
vs
2
ACE 52 CQB has 50% lower HIP base spread (Prone, Not moving)
Significantly less spread (HIP, Stand, Moving)
2.5
vs
4
ACE 52 CQB has 38% lower HIP base spread (Standing, Moving)
Significantly less spread (HIP, Crouching, Moving)
2
vs
3.5
ACE 52 CQB has 43% lower HIP base spread (Crouch, Moving)
Significantly less spread (HIP, Prone, Moving)
1.5
vs
3
ACE 52 CQB has 50% lower HIP base spread (Prone, Moving)
Equal stats on SR338 + None + None and ACE_52_CQB + None + None
Same tactical reload time (bullets left)
2.3 s
vs
2.3 s
Both guns tactical reload as fast as the other
Same Recoil decrease
12
vs
12
Both guns recover from recoil as fast as the other
19.794940948486